Look what the homosexuals have done to me!

Tag: Despicableness

Hitchcock Would’ve Loved This

One of the only Hitchcock films that bores me to tears.

This kind of stuff freaks me out. Jason Jones, a 26-year-old forklift operator, was arrested in May for the shooting death of a government witness in a drug case. Jones maintained his innocence and offered investigators an easy way to verify his alibi: they could check his MetroCard history to see where he’d been on the night of the murder. He said he had used public transportation to first stop at a cash-checking joint and later to visit his girlfriend, but police didn’t bother looking into it. That didn’t stop federal prosecutors from charging him with murder, which can carry a possible death sentence.

You can guess where this is going, right? A private investigator working for Jones’s attorney went to the jail where Jones had been held and found the MetroCard in question. He took it to the New York City Transit Authority, which was able to confirm that Jones had been on every bus and subway he said he’d been on that night. The investigator also found time-stamped, photographic proof that Jones had been at the cash-checking office with his coworkers just as he had always claimed. It was enough to get him released on bond, but the charges have yet to be dropped.

Aren’t the authorities supposed to check into these things before charges are filed, or is that the kind of silly, old-fashioned concept that’s essentially meaningless now, like the separation of church and state?

Lesbians, Check Your Windows

From the department of creepiness comes this ABC News story about Rosanne Strott and Emily Niland, two Massachusetts College of Art and Design students who were filmed “during an intimate encounter without their knowledge” by David Cunha and David Siemiesz, shithead perverts from a nearby dormitory.

Cunha and Siemiesz then uploaded the video to the Internet, where it made the rounds for several months before being brought to the attention of Strott and Niland, who are now pursuing legal action against the voyeurs and would like to see them expelled from the Wentworth Institute of Technology.

Siemiesz admits that recording them felt “kind of wrong” and preposterously claims “we didn’t understand the severity of the situation when we were taping it.” Wentworth is currently conducting its own investigation of the incident. Says Niland:

“Blinds open or not, I have nothing to be ashamed about. I might be embarrassed, I might feel violated, but I have nothing to be ashamed about. They are the ones who have something to be ashamed of.”

Unsurprisingly, many of the moronic reader comments that follow the story go like this:

“This looks like they need to buy some curtains. Just because they are gay doesn’t mean they can do it in public and if they are able to been see from the out side then it is public.”

Never mind the pesky fact that nobody was doing anything in public, or that no one is asking for special treatment on the basis of their sexuality: Any opportunity to complain about “the gays” is an opportunity that must be seized.

What the ABC News article leaves out, but the Boston Herald has already covered, is Strott’s comment that the men can be heard “remarking on her body and chanting antigay slurs” as they taped the encounter. In the same article, Siemiesz disingenuously maintains that, “I didn’t feel like a creep. I didn’t feel like a Peeping Tom. I felt like this type of thing happens a lot.”

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén