… As told by Ann Bauer in tomorrow’s Salon. (Bet you didn’t know I could time travel like that.) I have to say I’m underwhelmed. I mean, on top of everything else, Henry & June isn’t one of Philip Kaufman’s better films.
Okay, so it’s a crush that isn’t anything new. I first fell for Richardson when I was 10 years old and she hosted Saturday Night Live. It was her sketch with Phil Hartman, the one where she’s an actress who thinks of her father’s horrific death when she has to film crying scenes (“His head was in my lap!”), that did me in. I grew up wanting to write something funny for her to say.
It would be years before I saw her in anything again, and even then it was just the “New Best Friend” episode of Absolutely Fabulous. All I really knew about Richardson was that she starred in movies my parents wouldn’t let me see, so I became determined to watch The Crying Game and Damage as soon as I was old enough to rent R-rated movies. She is wickedly funny in the former as an IRA soldier who, if she had any martial arts training, would fit in perfectly with the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad. And her meltdown as a grieving mother in the latter is powerful enough to make you forget all the overwrought naked calisthenic exercises Jeremy Irons and Juliette Binoche had spent the previous 90 minutes engaged in.
Her most acclaimed performance came early in her career, in Mike Newell’s Dance with a Stranger, but I never felt that was an adequately passionate telling of the Ruth Ellis/David Blakely affair. Though Richardson took great care to show Ellis as a real woman and not a one-dimensional tabloid villainess, she generated about as much heat with Rupert Everett as Jodie Foster did with Matthew McConaughey in Contact. It was her openhearted take on another demonized woman, Vivienne Haigh-Wood, that resulted in what remains her most indelible performance.
Tom & Viv is a mostly meandering portrait of T. S. Eliot’s doomed marriage to the famously erratic Haigh-Wood, who suffered from what used to be called “women’s troubles” or “moral insanity,” and it doesn’t judge Eliot (or Vivienne’s brother Maurice) harshly enough. One scene actually finds Eliot pressing his head to the chest of an Anglican bishop for comfort, a single tear rolling down his cheek. Sentimental music plays as he chokes out, “I’m married to a woman that I love, but everything we do together falls apart. I crave companionship but I am completely alone.” Only briefly, near the very end of the movie, does anyone stop to consider how alone Vivienne must have felt.
A role as manic as Vivienne might seem like an open invitation to overact (and it has been suggested by more than one critic that Richardson is prone to scenery-chewing), but Richardson’s work in Tom & Viv was subtle and deeply intelligent despite the broad dramatic strokes of the screenplay. She showed her wildly misunderstood character far more tenderness and respect than the filmmakers could be bothered to summon, and the result was one of the most thoughtful, underrated movie performances of the 1990s.
But enough of my mindless film-geek prattle. This wasn’t supposed to be about any of that, it was supposed to be about a Q&A Richardson did with The Guardian this weekend and how her responses to their mini-interrogation only add to her already considerable crushworthiness. I think you’ll agree that on paper we’d make a fantastic couple. Look at all the things we have in common:
She likes Arcade Fire, I like Arcade Fire. They’re right here on my iPod, nestled snugly between Annie Lennox and Arctic Monkeys. (Don’t give me any shit about the Arctic Monkeys, people. How many songs have you ever heard that contain references to both Duran Duran and Shakespeare?)
South Park keeps her awake at night, and rarely a week goes by that I don’t find myself singing “Uncle Fucka” while doing the dishes or feeding my cat.
She’s fond of the word “enfilade,” I know how to spell the world “enfilade.”
She hates Mugabe, I hate Mugabe. Most people hate Mugabe, but Mugabe’s fun to type and that’s why I put it here. See? Mugabe, Mugabe, Mugabe.
She’d want to be played by Peter Lorre or Eddie Izzard in a movie of her life. How cool is that? I’ve often thought that Peter Lorre would make an excellent me in a movie of my life, seeing as we’re both diminutive Jews with morphine addictions. (Of course, I’d also settle for Edward G. Robinson. I’ve never smoked cigars or run an underground crime syndicate, but he would’ve found a way to make it work anyway.) As for Izzard — who is also on my iPod, right between Eddie Floyd and Edwin Starr — he looks better in a dress than I do, so I’d just as soon he play my love interest. Or, you know, if the movie is really realistic and shows me reading Patricia Highsmith novels instead of going on dates, he could always play my mom, regularly probing me about my personal life and despairing that if I don’t get my act together he’ll never be a grandmother.
Of course, “on paper” means nothing. On paper I’m an art collector (I own a few vintage Jean-Pierre Melville movie posters), an expert skier (I’ve walked down icy hills once or twice without falling) and a skilled jazz pianist (I enjoy listening to Thelonious Monk). Still, I think the next time Miranda Richardson visits the United States she should look me up. My Peter Lorre and her Eddie Izzard could do things together that Goebbels would’ve only dreamed of putting in a Nazi propaganda film about degeneracy.
Disclosure: This post contains rental/purchase links. As an Amazon Associate I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.
From the department of creepiness comes this ABC News story about Rosanne Strott and Emily Niland, two Massachusetts College of Art and Design students who were filmed “during an intimate encounter without their knowledge” by David Cunha and David Siemiesz, shithead perverts from a nearby dormitory.
Cunha and Siemiesz then uploaded the video to the Internet, where it made the rounds for several months before being brought to the attention of Strott and Niland, who are now pursuing legal action against the voyeurs and would like to see them expelled from the Wentworth Institute of Technology.
Siemiesz admits that recording them felt “kind of wrong” and preposterously claims “we didn’t understand the severity of the situation when we were taping it.” Wentworth is currently conducting its own investigation of the incident. Says Niland:
“Blinds open or not, I have nothing to be ashamed about. I might be embarrassed, I might feel violated, but I have nothing to be ashamed about. They are the ones who have something to be ashamed of.”
Unsurprisingly, many of the moronic reader comments that follow the story go like this:
“This looks like they need to buy some curtains. Just because they are gay doesn’t mean they can do it in public and if they are able to been see from the out side then it is public.”
Never mind the pesky fact that nobody was doing anything in public, or that no one is asking for special treatment on the basis of their sexuality: Any opportunity to complain about “the gays” is an opportunity that must be seized.
What the ABC News article leaves out, but the Boston Heraldhas already covered, is Strott’s comment that the men can be heard “remarking on her body and chanting antigay slurs” as they taped the encounter. In the same article, Siemiesz disingenuously maintains that, “I didn’t feel like a creep. I didn’t feel like a Peeping Tom. I felt like this type of thing happens a lot.”
The 18-year-old daughter of Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick came out in Bay Windows, a New England-based GLBT newspaper, today. Katherine Patrick, who will attend Smith College in the fall, was interviewed with her father, a longtime champion of gay rights, and her mother, Diane. Rather adorably, the governor got teary-eyed when his daughter praised his successful effort to defeat a proposed anti-gay marriage amendment to theMassachusetts Constitutionin 2007. Katherine also noted, of her initial coming out to her parents, that “the first thing my dad did was, [he] wrapped me in a bear hug and said, ‘Well, we love you no matter what.'” Which reminds me of my own coming out, if I might digress.
It was a muggy night in August, just weeks before my senior year of high school was about to start,and I was alone with my parents. (That isn’t something that happens very often when you have three siblings.) I’m not sure how the conversation came about, just that I was very nervous. I’m afraid it might have gone something like this:
Mom: So, how ’bout that heat?
Dad: Yeah, it’s really something.
Me: I’m gay! I’m a homosexual! I like girls!
Because sometimes, when I’m anxious about something, I have trouble following conversations. (I also have trouble following conversations even when I’m not anxious about anything, but that’s not your problem now, is it?) If memory serves, it was quiet for a while. I remember my face feeling red, which tends to happen anytime I talk in front of anybody, and my parents exchanging one of those very parental glances, the kind that lets you know they’ve secretly been discussing this very subject behind your back for weeks or months or possibly years. Then my dad slowly extended his hand, not to pull me into an emotional embrace but to demand the $50 he bet my mom that I was a big ‘mo.
Anyway, read the interview with the Patrick family. They all sound very cool.
As the state of California prepares to start issuing marriage licenses to gay couples next week, a piece in today’s New York Times examines “the egalitarian nature” of same-sex relationships.
When asked to comment on whether they think it’s true that same-sex couples “fight more fairly” and are better at dividing household chores than their heterosexual counterparts, my parents got into a vicious argument that started with my father saying “There’s no such thing as a fair fight with your mother,” and continued with my mom snapping, “Your father would have to know what chores are before he tried doing any.”
Realizing that thirty years’ worth of grievances were about to be rehashed in clinical detail for the 3,758th time, I hightailed it out of there without asking any follow-up questions. Good times!
Asked who he’d “boff, marry or kill” between Hillary Clinton, John McCain and Barack Obama, Alec Baldwin (the talented Baldwin, the one nine out of ten dentists recommend) answered that he’d sleep with Hillary and wed the senator from Illinois. Baldwin told The Observer:
“Barack would just be my long-term companion, as they say. I’d have to have sex with a woman because I’m not gay. I wouldn’t want to have sex with Barack Obama or McCain. Obama’s wife perhaps. Anybody’s wife — Bush’s wife, McCain’s wife, but no men — not even operating the video camera.”
Alec baldwin
As for McCain, Baldwin isn’t willing to kill him off:
“Maybe I’d lead him out into the woods and leave him there, and I’d come back and tell you that I’d killed him. But I’d lie, I wouldn’t really kill him. And knowing McCain, knowing his past in Vietnam, he’d make it back, he’d survive.”
alec baldwin
You know, as much as I like Michelle Obama (and I’ve kind of loved her since reading this New Yorker profile back in March) I’m intrigued by the idea of Baldwin as First Spouse. I imagine him promoting literacy to schoolchildren à la Laura Bush, but instead of sitting there all glassy-eyed and quiet he’d pound on desks and say things like, “We’re adding a little something to this month’s reading contest. As you all know, first prize is a Cadillac Eldorado. Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you’re fired.” It would really inspire children to pick up books, I think. Kids love bland, boxy luxury vehicles and free cutlery.
Jena Malone, a talented actress whose career Evan Rachel Wood seems to have stolen (or maybe not: would Malone have agreed to star in something as crappy as The Life Before Her Eyes?), has always been candid about having been raised in a Heather Has Two Mommies arrangement. Still, it was nice to read this in her new interview with The Independent:
“I was raised by two mums who were lovers. When I was younger it wasn’t anything that was abnormal. I had two mums and for me that was really exciting because when I was younger most people seemed to like their mum more than their dad so I’d be like, ‘Ha, I’ve got two of them!’ And I feel I got a lot of love, respect and acceptance from them. I had a really healthy normal relationship with my parents.”
Malone also tells reporter Lesley O’Toole that she takes pictures of her mothers, her sister and her father with her when she travels. It is unclear whether she packs photos of Mandy Moore’s breasts as well.
The new Weezer CD comes out today. I am sad about the cover, which is pictured above. I am slightly sad about the first single, “Pork and Beans.” (The buzzsaw guitars are cool, though.) This is all in addition to a profound lingering sadness over the travesty that was Make Believe, of course.
And yet, I can’t help myself. My love for The Blue Album, and especially Pinkerton, is so great, so all-consuming, that I will end up buying The Red Album. The deluxe edition, probably. If you want to line up to smack me or something, go ahead, but I know for a fact that several of you own Spice Girls CDs. Think about that before you pass judgment. And think about Rivers Cuomo moaning “If everyone’s a little queer / Why can’t she be a little straight?” in “Pink Triangle,” his song about a straight man’s unrequited crush on a lesbian. How can you not love him, even in that ridiculous cowboy hat?
A lesbian couple in Bulawayo, the second largest city in Zimbabwe, have announced they’re expecting a child conceived via artificial insemination. Zimbabwe, as you probably know, is not a particularly gay-friendly country; two years ago, their government passed legislation making it illegal for gay couples to hold hands or even hug. President Robert Mugabe, who chooses to believe that homosexuality doesn’t exist in the animal kingdom, has gone on record as saying that gays are “worse than dogs or pigs.” (Clearly he has never met my parents’ dog, who couldn’t be more bisexual if he were a character in Velvet Goldmine.)
Given Zimbabwe’s charming national history of institutionalized homophobia, this article condemning the happy couple shouldn’t come as any surprise, but I still found myself taken aback by the harsh language used by journalist Sithabisiwe Mathema, who refers to the pregnancy as an “uncanny and bizarre incident” perpetrated by the “seemingly conscienceless” lesbian couple, who traveled to South Africa for the procedure.
Mathema describes artificial insemination as a process “commonly used for animal breeding purposes,” neglecting to point out that it’s widely used by heterosexual humans as well, and strangely posits that it “stands to be seen” how a lesbian couple will be able to raise a child, nonsensically adding that, “like other children the baby will have to call one of them father and the other mother.”
As for the lengthy and completely bizarre comments offered by Aaron Ndlovu, who lives in the same flat as the expectant couple and apparently considers himself some kind of scientist (the kind who is completely fucking stupid), I’ll let you to discover those gems on your own and leave you with the words of Melissa Jacobs, the woman whose pregnancy inspired all this vitriol: “We are so enthralled about the birth of our son. We feel so proud even though people look at us disdainfully — they do not understand that even though we are ‘faggots’ as they call us, we also want to fulfill dreams of also raising a family to carry on our name.”