Look what the homosexuals have done to me!

Category: In the News Page 3 of 4

What Is On This Lesbian’s Head?

And did she kill it before putting it there? I’ve never seen Jane Velez-Mitchell on CNN (or Headline News) before, but it would add to the excitement of the broadcast if there was always the possibility that her hair — which appears to be a roadkill-inspired variation on the Carol Brady shag — might get up and walk away. (That’s the kind of suspense that keeps me watching Frank Cusumano’s sports segments on KSDK, don’t you know.)

The most important parts of yesterday’s New York Times profile of Velez-Mitchell were the following:

Jane Velez-Mitchell is a true-crime author, a television talking head, a lesbian, an animal activist, a recovering alcoholic and a vegan.

and…

Ms. Velez-Mitchell’s hour of water-cooler talk, delivered with heavy doses of opinion, reached an average of 596,000 viewers in February, up 74 percent from the slot’s average for the same month last year, when the conservative commentator Glenn Beck was the host.

That’s fantastic, isn’t it, when HLN viewers prefer a lesbian vegan/animal activist to the insufferable Glenn Beck? The only thing I don’t understand is why the Times had to point out that she’s a recovering alcoholic: I’m pretty sure that “true-crime author” is a euphemism for that, so it was a little redundant.

P.S. If I ever get a gig on CNN, I plan on either wearing a clown wig or a Tina Turner circa Private Dancer wig on-air. Actually, who needs CNN as an excuse? I’m going to wear a rainbow-colored clown wig all day tomorrow just for the hell of it.

Uganda Confronts the Gay Menace

“Shh… We don’t want those men who are singing show tunes to know we’re here.”

Take a look at this press release straight out of Uganda:

Family Life Network and other stakeholders in Uganda have organized a three-day seminar to provide what they termed as reliable and up to date information so that people can know how to protect themselves, their children, families [sic] from homosexuality.

What kind of protective “how to keep your kids away from the evil gay agenda” measures do you think the Family Life Network will advocate at this seminar? I hope parents are encouraged to take a page from Jodie Foster’s book and build a panic room. The joke would go right over their heads, of course, but you’d have to assume that happens with some regularity when you’re dealing with people who feel compelled to defend themselves against homosexuality. Which reminds me: I saw an obscure Bela Lugosi movie on TCM last October — they played it in the middle of the night, after yet another screening of White Zombie — that suggested garlic will do the trick.

Clutch Those Pearls, Irish Lady!

Parents can be funny about “the gay.” My mom and dad, for example, were fine with my coming out; their only complaint was that I waited too long to tell them. (My parents, it should be noted, are insane: I came out to them when I was in high school. What was I supposed to do, celebrate my fifth-grade graduation by flinging the closet door open? It’s not like I had a clue what was going on back then. When I turned on VH1 hoping to catch George Michael’s “Freedom! ’90” video, I thought it was because I liked the music.)

But even though they’ve adopted this “Give me a G, give me an A, give me a Y!” rah-rah attitude, voting for pro-gay politicians and seeing Brokeback Mountain in theaters (which was good because it meant my dad had to watch guys make out, but bad because he doesn’t seem to realize now that not all gay people are tortured ranch hands from Wyoming), they still use a few phrases that make me cringe. The most popular one is “We just want you to be happy.”

Shouldn’t that go without saying, that your parents want you to be happy? How often do parents, even really poor excuses for parents, tell their children, “We want you to be unhappy. Seriously, Tim, we’ve never liked you. We’re not even indifferent to your happiness. We hate you so much that every Wednesday and Saturday, right after we pray to win the Powerball jackpot, we ask God and Jesus and your dear departed grandpa up in heaven to make sure your life is full of heartache and misery.”

And what about this one: “It’s just that it’s such a hard life.” What the hell are the people who say that talking about? What is so hard about being a gay adult in the United States in the year 2009? Fine, so the world is full of homophobes. The world is also full of racists and sexists and anti-Semites, yet not once has anyone ever sat me down and said, “You know that I love you and accept you, and that I’ve never had a problem with you being a girl. It’s just that I worry about you. It’s such a hard life, having to sit when you pee and not being guaranteed the right to vote until 1920.”

When my dad hauls out the old “such a hard life” chestnut, I have to take a deep breath to keep from snapping, “Having cancer is hard. Learning to use a prosthetic leg is hard. Living in dire poverty is hard. Being transfixed by Eva Mendes’ ass is not.”

But there’s something else I won’t complain about from now on: My dad. Because over the weekend I read something in The Irish Independent that put all his hand-wringing in perspective. Behold, the parents who are “devastated because our only son says he’s homosexual.” The mother’s hysterical letter to an advice columnist includes passages like:

I have prayed until I am sick. My husband is on medication for high blood pressure, is severely stressed all the time, and cannot sleep. He says “never a day goes by that I don’t cry.” What a waste.

I am distressed, crying bitterly, and full of guilty questions like where did we go wrong. What did we do, or fail to do? I cannot close my eyes at night without crying out loud and wondering and worrying about him. How can we relieve this situation?

We have not discussed the issue with friends, although some close relations are aware of it. We feel we have to sell our small business and move away from here. I don’t think I can bear this any longer. Yes, we think of the anguish our son must have gone through/must still be going through, his loneliness and isolation. Yet he is happy to visit gay clubs and meet with other men.

What are the odds that all the “anguish” her son is going through has more to do with having nutcase parents than liking gay porn? (She mentions porn in the full letter.) And what does she think selling her business and moving is going to accomplish? She’s still going to know her son’s a big ‘mo regardless of where she lives.

And her husband! His blood pressure’s through the roof, he can’t stop crying… He sounds a little queeny himself with all the melodrama. If I were the hugging type, I’d hug both of my parents today. And once the shock subsided and they asked what it was for, I’d say, “For not being fuckheads.” Warms the cockles of your heart, doesn’t it?

Wanna Despair of Humanity?

More than usual, I mean. If so, read this. (Or you could just wait a few months for the inevitable Law & Order episode based on this particular crime to hit airwaves.)

Why Does Xbox Live Hate the Gays?

I’m not a video game person (though I used to take down fierce opponents — namely my mom and her best friend — in matches of Tetris and Dr. Mario, and was known to break the occasional window in games of Paperboy), so everything I’ve heard about Xbox Live has come directly from my brother and his geeky pals.

What they’ve told me is that more than a few of their fellow gamers are hateful, foul-mouthed bastards with a fondness for anti-gay slurs. All of which adds to my confusion about Microsoft’s purported practice of suspending users who identify themselves as gay in their player profiles. Why is the word “gay” considered offensive when it’s used by a gay person, but acceptable when employed by trolls as an insult? And if Microsoft isn’t willing to give the gays a break here, what code word should they use to get the point across without risking a suspension? I tried to come up with something all smart-assy, but I’m stumped.

Between Awards, An Oscar Observation (2009 Edition)

Boy, those musical numbers are really going to go a long way in making people think Hugh Jackman isn’t gay, aren’t they?

“What? Marisa Tomei for My Cousin Vinny?!”

UPDATE (10:04 AM Monday): Holy Bob Hope, was that a boring night. Lots of predictable and undeserving winners, which was par for the course, but the producers didn’t offer anything to make up for it. And most of the speeches were so scripted and awful (still, anytime Penélope Cruz wants a date, I’m free), with the exception of Dustin Lance Black’s, which was the best and most moving of the night.

The insipid New Age-y/Oprah-style “We Speak Your Name” nominee ego-stroking in the acting categories was also problematic; only a few of the presenters (Eva Marie Saint, Whoopi Goldberg and Robert De Niro come to mind) were able to pull it off. Next year I propose having Steve Martin hand out all of the awards. Yes, my love for him is known far and wide, but he excels at taking the piss out of the same pretentious, self-congratulatory nitwits whose approval Hugh Jackman so nakedly desires. And so what if Jackman’s a song-and-dance man? Anyone who has seen Pennies from Heaven and All of Me knows that Martin can cut a rug with the best of them.

Are You Ready For Some Football Oscars?

Awards are essentially meaningless, like almost everything else in life.

Last year, as you might recall, I covered the Oscar telecast. I’ve been asked if I plan to do the same tonight, and the answer is probably not. I’m underwhelmed by a lot of this year’s nominees and don’t think it’d be much fun to write about them, though a last-minute change of mind is possible. (A last-minute change of mind is always possible, unless it’s about something like voting Republican.)

Also blasé about tonight’s ceremony: the normally excitable Robert Osborne, the reigning queen of Turner Classic Movies and a professional Oscar historian, who recently told The Chicago Sun-Times: “We forget that the importance of the Oscars is to award artistic achievement. I’m not sure it is anymore.” I’m with Osborne on two things — that the Best Supporting Actress push for Kate Winslet in The Reader was ridiculous (she ended up being nominated in the Best Actress category and is widely expected to win; I’d rather see Melissa Leo take it for Frozen River), and that it would be great if Frank Langella won Best Actor for Frost/Nixon.

Langella isn’t thought to stand a chance in the year of Milk and The Wrestler, but he’s my sentimental favorite because Oscars, as we all know, are often awarded not to the winning performance, but for a performance previously overlooked by the Academy. In my opinion, Langella deserved to win last year for Starting Out in the Evening, but his work in that film wasn’t recognized with a nomination. Honestly, I’m still shocked by that — how dare the Academy disrespect Count Dracula! Hopefully he makes the rounds at the after-parties tonight and bites all their necks.

UK to Bigoted Phelps Clan: “Fuck Off, You Wankers”

Remember Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary of the UK who made waves a few months ago when she basically told Iranian gays seeking asylum in the United Kingdom to piss off and stay closeted in their home country to avoid execution?

She’s attracting headlines again this week, and this time it’s for something good: American hate-mongers and national embarrassments Fred and Shirley Phelps want to stage one of their moronic protest publicity stunts outside a Hampshire, England performance of The Laramie Project, and Smith is having none of it: She has blocked Fred and Shirley from entering the UK on the grounds that they’re hatred-inciting extremists.

Not everyone is satisfied with Smith’s decision (gay rights activist Peter Tatchell doesn’t understand why homophobic Jamaican reggae singers don’t face similar bans), but I like it. Not as much as I’d like to see Fred and Shirley picketed by thousands of angry gays and stylish drag queens holding signs that say “God Hates Hags,” but it’ll do for now.

Edited to add: Smith, by the way, is still insane.

Jo Monk Kicks Ass

The 91-year-old lesbian, who is working on a book about her life, had this to say about being gay in the 1940s and ’50s (and way before that): “Everybody says what a terrible life it was, but I quite enjoyed myself. I didn’t find it terrible. I was very proud.” And she was wearing pants in public when it was still considered daring for a woman to do so, which just adds to her greatness.

Lesbians, Does This Appeal to You?

You might think this description of life in a lesbian community sounds like the work of David Sedaris — I know I hoped it was — but alas, it’s a real article from the Times:

BEHIND the gate at Alapine, about five miles from the nearest town in the southern Appalachian mountains near Georgia, the women live in simple houses or double-wide trailers on roads they have named after goddesses, like Diana Drive. They meet for potluck dinners, movie and game nights and “community full moon circles” during which they sing, read poems and share thoughts on topics like “Mercury in retrograde — how is it affecting our communication?”

I would sooner kill myself than live in a community like that (the first time someone asked me how Mercury in retrograde was affecting our communication, I’d snap “Are you fucking kidding me?”), but I guess it takes all kinds.

Page 3 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén